Thanks @Stelios, that completes the record on all three points, and the transparency throughout this grant has been appreciated.
We have now reviewed the full record across all three milestones on our side, and the delivery picture is clear: the build shipped, the grassroots channel fell well short of the targets you set for the workshop pivot, and the traction you describe came from organic product usage. Measured against the ecosystem-impact standards the DAO applies today, the realized on-chain footprint is still modest for a grant of this size: roughly twenty campaigns on the AON factory since the mainnet deployment, and the 0.7 RBTC of May AON volume you reported. That is a baseline, not a criticism of execution.
If the team brings a follow-on proposal, we’d encourage anchoring it in FES-style results per the grant guidelines: measurable ecosystem value on Rootstock such as transaction volume, new wallets, and TVL, with the evidence path defined up front, and concrete targets for moving that baseline. The organic AON usage you described looks like the strongest foundation to build that case on.