# \[2603\] RelayDevkit **URL:** \ **Category:** Grants & Incentives\ **Created:** [March 12, 2026, 7:00pm UTC](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/2603-relaydevkit/772 "2026-03-12T19:00:34Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 15
**Author:** ![SEEDGov](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/seedgov/32/673_2.png) [@SEEDGov](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/u/SEEDGov)\ **Post date:** [April 21, 2026, 1:32pm UTC](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/2603-relaydevkit/772/15 "2026-04-21T13:32:46Z")
> [@Curia](#): > > Also we’d like to point out that there is no need to rush resubmitting the proposal for a vote immediately after the rescope. We think delegates need some time to properly review the changes and the discussion process itself is important. So would like to better understand the reason behind the quick resubmission after posting the updated scope in the thread. We agree with this point, which [we recently expressed](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/seedgov-delegate-thread/774/3) in a proposal whose author acted in a similar manner. It is not good governance practice to modify a proposal and immediately submit it for a vote, as this does not allow for it to be analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, it should be noted that [the original proposal](https://app.rootstockcollective.xyz/proposals/20020649620005391174308698409027411175347044058711340763327230106363280231434) is still in voting period. There is no justification for proceeding with such urgency. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/2603-relaydevkit/772)._