# \[Grant Proposal\] DZap — One-Click RIF Staking on Rootstock

**URL:** <https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/grant-proposal-dzap-one-click-rif-staking-on-rootstock/904>\
**Category:** Grants & Incentives\
**Created:** [July 11, 2026, 6:59am UTC](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/grant-proposal-dzap-one-click-rif-staking-on-rootstock/904 "2026-07-11T06:59:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 22

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tane](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/tane/32/223_2.png) [@Tane](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/u/Tane)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2026, 5:02pm UTC](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/grant-proposal-dzap-one-click-rif-staking-on-rootstock/904/22 "2026-08-25T17:02:45Z")

</div>

Adding to @ChronoTrigger’s suggestion to take time before resubmitting: one point has not come up in the thread yet and we think it belongs in the revised proposal.

At $4,500 this grant sits in the Scaling tier, and the [guidelines](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/general-guidelines-for-grant-applications/94/9) attach a minimum Funding Efficiency Score of 1.5x over twelve months to that tier. The net-new wallets and net-new RIF staked you have committed to reporting are the right components, but the proposal never connects them to that bar. What is missing is a twelve-month figure for those metrics, and how you propose to value them, so delegates can check the ask against 1.5x rather than against a month-one estimate. We would rather see that in the revised proposal than argue about it after the vote.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.rootstockcollective.xyz/t/grant-proposal-dzap-one-click-rif-staking-on-rootstock/904)._