Agreed with the points raised by @ChronoTrigger on track record and ownership — these were also the basis for our against vote on the previous version of this proposal. We hope the team has taken the time to read the delegate rationales from that vote, as they may add useful color to the concerns being raised in this thread.
One additional question we would like the team to address before reconsidering our position: are you currently active on other funded grants in other ecosystems? Given that long-term maintenance is already deferred to a separate future ask, understanding the team’s current bandwidth across commitments is relevant to assessing delivery confidence here.