From the perspective of governance facilitators: Additional initiatives beyond the agreed scope of delegate work are of course a sight to behold. DAOs are place for permissionless participation. They sit a the far end of permeability where basically anyone can walk in and participate to provide value.
The right approach to think about this is to distinguish value accretion from extraction, in my opinion.
Is there value accruing to Rootstock?
If so, how do delegates share in the actual value created?
An excellent example here is the Aave Chan Initiative that brought in multiple millions in revenue for a modest price tag. They started to provide value, and then got funds from the DAO.
In my opinion the way to approach additional participation is by having a very well formed and proven course of action for how to accrue value to Rootstock Collective, then actually start producing that value, and then getting a cut of that, as is right.
Rootstock is a fantastic product with a tight flywheel for mutually beneficial value creation. Let’s buidl.