Thanks for the effort you’ve put into the proposal and for staying engaged with feedback, it’s clear you’re motivated to build on Rootstock, and that commitment is appreciated.
That said, I’m voting against the proposal in its current form.
Even after the revisions, it’s still missing several core elements outlined in the updated grant process, such as:
- Clear, measurable milestones (especially for Wave 1)
- A public GitHub or basic technical specs
- A video pitch
- A more concrete value proposition for Rootstock
- Some level of public presence or traction
Without those, it’s hard to justify funding. But I think here’s potential here if you take the time to refine the plan and gain some early traction. You might consider exploring the Collective Rewards program as a way to get started and build trust with the community.
Happy to revisit this in the future if things move forward.