Tané Delegate Thread

[25.06] Grant application - roketto [Wave 1 - Re-evaluated] (Onchain)

Summary:

This proposal seeks a $15,000 grant for Roketto, a decentralized launchpad that enables anyone to launch tokens and run IDOs on Rootstock without coding, with additional funding requested for mainnet deployment and audits. The main challenge highlighted in the discussion is the long-term sustainability of Roketto’s operations and revenue beyond the initial grant, as well as transparency in project vetting and budget allocation.

Vote: AGAINST

Rationale:

This proposal lacks several key elements that are necessary for us to confidently support a grant at this stage. Clear and measurable milestones, especially for Wave 1, have not been articulated. Additionally, the project has yet to present a video pitch or demonstrate concrete value for the Rootstock ecosystem, and there is little evidence of public presence or early traction. We believe the team should first deliver on these outputs before funding is approved.

Geyser All-or-Nothing Crowdfunding powered by Rootstock (Onchain)

Summary:

This proposal introduces a $20,000 integration that brings an All-or-Nothing crowdfunding model to Geyser using Rootstock smart contracts. By locking contributions until a campaign hits its goal, it boosts contributor confidence while showcasing Rootstock as Bitcoin’s programmable escrow layer.

Vote: AGAINST

Rationale:

This proposal presents conflicting information because the Tally description requests a $20,000 grant, yet the forum discussion describes it as an application for the Builder Rewards program.

Approving a measure whose funding pathway is unclear would erode transparency and make post vote accountability impossible. We ask the team to resubmit a clean proposal that explicitly matches one category and its evaluation criteria so delegates can assess it properly. For these reasons we oppose the proposal in its current form.