After reviewing the available materials, including technical docs, T&Cs, and demo & youtube video, I’m leaning against supporting the grant in its current form. Let me explain why, constructively.
There’s currently no public repo or testnet deployment to verify progress, and the vault logic isn’t linked to auditable addresses. While the demo video helps, it’s not enough to validate the technical implementation or justify a grant of this size.
The custody model described in the Terms (section 4.3) suggests that actions can be triggered without user approval if a “beneficiary” requests it. That’s a setup that might need further clarity, especially in a Web3 context.
The team has limited public presence on GitHub or dev channels, and no smart contracts or contributors have been shared. There are also no active updates or content posted on X or forums, which makes it harder to follow progress or build external trust.
Finally, I understand the team received a previous grant (Proposal 2410), but the forum thread is no longer accessible, so it’s hard to assess deliverables from that round.
I’d be happy to reconsider support once there’s more technical transparency, testnet activity, and product validation.