Thanks @AndrewG for the updated proposal. Appreciated your patient and diligent effort to accommodate the community’s feedback and make the proposal better for the Rootstock ecosystem.
We believe the general direction of the change is great and are leaning toward supporting the proposal. We have a couple of questions/feedback as below:
As this feature is aiming to target a new segment of users, we think it’s better to set an absolute number rather than a relative number. Let’s say, 100 new users through this integration. For the Active address usage, how about using some retention number, X% of users who are onboarded through this integration retain after X months?
Seeing the list of dapps there, we think it’s better to target a few Rootstock native dapps that you can see on DefiLlama, so that the global Rootstock wallet integration is more relevant.
Regarding the gas sponsorship allocation, if it’s under-utilized, will it be subject to be returned?