Hello @juanipodesta and @Mattsanto , while we were doing some additional due diligence from our comments above, we noticed that in July of last year, that Beexo Protocol was deactived by RTLabs from the RootstockCollective Builder program, due to the US based geo restrictions. Shortly after that, in August, there was another post by you for the Beexo Wallet as a “Self-Custodial” standard.
To ensure the Collective remains in full regulatory alignment, has Beexo Protocol or its parent entity changed its legal jurisdiction or corporate structure since the July 2025 decision? If the entity remains affected under the same US-based restrictions that led to its 2025 deactivation, how does the team propose we structure the $12,500 grant to avoid conflict with existing Collective compliance requirements?
In your August 2025 post, Beexo was described as a “Hybrid Wallet (DeFi & CeFi).” However, this current proposal focuses heavily on “BTCFi and Decentralized Governance”. Will the 500–800 users onboarded during this CryptoVendimIA event be interacting with the CeFi/Fiat-rail components of the app, or will they be strictly on-chain via Rootstock? Your proposal is not clear on that.
As we noted above, (and even more so now), the importance to mitigate any potential compliance risks, would the team be open to making the onboarding wallet agnostic? This would allow the event to support Beexo (if the first point has been addressed - i.e. US based restrictions) while also encouraging the use of other DAO-supported, non-restricted wallets (like Metamask or Ledger), ensuring the 1,500 attendees are funneled into the broader ecosystem regardless of their preferred tool.