[Revised Scope] RelayDevKit - Milestone 1
Voted AGAINST this proposal for potential security concerns.
[Revised Scope] RelayDevKit - Milestone 1
Voted AGAINST this proposal. It was submitted onchain before the vote even concluded for the initial proposal.
Blockscout Global Wallet - Milestone 2
Voted FOR the Milestone 2 payout. Blockscout has successfully delivered on its Milestone 2 commitments, meeting key deliverables and KPIs across engagement and retention metrics. The team has demonstrated commendable transparency in communicating the challenges they encountered throughout this milestone.
Their collaborative approach with the DAO continues to stand out — in Milestone 1, they proactively negotiated a reduced budget, and in Milestone 2, the payout has again been adjusted from $8,000 down to $3,500 to account for gas sponsorship delays. This kind of accountability and good-faith engagement with the DAO is worth recognizing.
Looking ahead to Milestone 3, I hope the team is able to resolve the gas sponsorship situation and expand their integration partnerships to drive broader adoption.
[RootstockCollective Ambassador Proposal] Renewal Proposal – Multi-Ambassador Extension M1 & M2
I voted Against the current proposal. While I appreciate the work done by Karan and Kath — both have consistently delivered strong performance and earned the maximum monthly compensation — I believe the program needs some improvements before renewal.I’d like to see monthly rewards more clearly tied to measurable outcomes, higher engagement targets (e.g. growing likes and reach on content), and better collaboration with delegates so we can help amplify the content and events.I support extending the ambassador program, but not in its current form. Happy to vote in favor once these points are addressed in a revised proposal.
[Grant 0705] Recognized Delegate Compensation - April 2026
Voted FOR this proposal to make delegate compensation payments to the delegates who qualified in March. I am supportive of this program as it strengthens governance by rewarding delegates who make consistent and meaningful contributions.
RBTC Onboarding EventKit
Voted ABSTAIN. The underlying problem seems real, and I appreciate @Crackdevs responsiveness to delegate feedback. The proposal has improved: the Rootstock-specific implementation concern appears to have been addressed, the milestones are clearer, and there are now public validation comments from external product teams including Pistachio, Deserialize, and PouchSwap.
My hesitation is that the demand signal still feels early. For a developer tooling/infrastructure grant, I’d like to see validation move beyond “open to reviewing/testing” and closer to committed usage, a pilot, or a named integration path from teams likely to adopt the package after release.
I see the potential value of this developer tooling project, but I’d prefer to evaluate it again under the updated grants process with a stronger demand-validation package attached.
[2510] Grant Proposal - Self Sovereign Identity (SSI) sandbox rootstock integration, maturity and al
Voted AGAINST. This proposal has an administrative technicality in the dApp’s UI. The Rootstock team will be pushing a fix soon so that the proposal author can resubmit their proposal.
Voted AGAINST. Although I understand that it is a tough market right now, the proposal has meaningfully shifted from what delegates were evaluating earlier.
At the M2 stage, the signed/onboarded cohort was Peach Bitcoin, Cyclo, Caddy Finance, and Blockroll. Shortly after that, Francisco noted that Cyclo and Caddy Finance were expected to be the primary candidates/drivers for the final TVL and ecosystem goals. That made sense to me at the time: those were more clearly DeFi / BTCFi-oriented integrations with a plausible path to meaningful Rootstock liquidity or usage.
But in the current tracking sheet, the actual live deployments are only Peach Bitcoin and Superstake. Caddy Finance, Cyclo, Blockroll, and Tipper are now marked as dropped. That is a pretty large change in the substance of the program and therefore difficult to justify the 15k funding request.
Self Sovereign Identity (SSI) sandbox rootstock integration, maturity and alpha launch
Voted FOR this proposal. The proposal was previously defeated due to an administrative technicality. Now that it has been addressed and the proposal is resubmitted, I voted in support.