Proposal: [RootstockCollective Ambassador Proposal] Renewal Proposal – Multi-Ambassador Extension M1 & M2
Vote: For
Rationale: While we acknowledge the concerns raised by other delegates regarding the KPI around onboarding stakers not being fully met as initially intended, we believe it is more constructive to continue adjusting the program along the way, with @Georgia already actively coordinating with the ambassadors and working to address those concerns, rather than pausing it entirely, which could ultimately create more downside than benefit.
The ambassadors responsibilities are not limited to attracting stakers alone. Their role also includes creating content, engaging with the community, increasing awareness, and hosting local activities, etc. Continuing the program would allow ambassadors to maintain the momentum and relationships they have already built with their local communities. We also think the value of ambassador programs extends beyond a single metric, since their long-term goal is to help expand Rootstock’s presence and strengthen connections with local communities. Therefore, pausing the program at this stage could risk losing that momentum and potentially reduce community engagement overall.