Proposal: [2603 Grant Proposal] Rootstock India | RootstockCollective
Vote: AGAINST
Rationale: We voted against the proposal for two main reasons:
-
First, as we do not consider it good governance practice to promote debate and exchange of views by publishing a proposal on a Friday and bringing it to a vote just 24 hours later, on a Saturday. There is no justification for proceeding with such urgency.
-
And second, regarding the substance of the proposal, because we considere that producing educational content about Rootstock requires prior coordination with the Lab and the DAO to ensure that the quality meets expected standards. It is also necessary to establish a clear framework for the use of Rootstock’s intellectual property, as well as to define in what capacity the presenters would be acting. This is particularly important given that these proposed events would be organized by a chain-agnostic community, and they will not include the presence of the Lab team or official Rootstock ambassadors, which requires a higher level of rigor in both content and communication.