Vote: FOR
Rationale:
Routine monthly distribution under the standing eligibility model: the on-chain executable matches the published 3,750 USDRIF total, and the per-delegate amounts follow the posted July results.
Disclaimer: we are a beneficiary of the delegate compensation via this proposal.
Vote: AGAINST
Rationale:
The on-chain executable withdraws 1,350 rBTC natively from the treasury against a $1,350 M1 request, and the title omits the [YYMM Grant] convention. Paying out in the wrong asset is disqualifying regardless of the proposal’s merits; this needs a corrected resubmission.
Vote: FOR
Rationale:
M3 funds frontend migration, the Widget/SDK, developer docs, and the mobile interface, none of which touch the contracts awaiting audit, so the unresolved audit funding is not a reason to hold this tranche. The budget stays flat at $4,000 despite the added scope, and the adoption-gated M4 tranche stays held back until the machinery this milestone builds proves out.
Vote: FOR
Rationale:
The application now meets the Collective Rewards submission requirements, with four products live on mainnet behind linked contracts, an introduction video, and a 50% Backer Reward, and the original BΔLT contracts carry an independent Coinspect audit. Whether the suite earns backing is for stRIF holders to decide cycle by cycle.