We appreciate the effort reflected in your updated PDF, particularly the improved clarity around budget usage. However, as @Kaf_Anode and @DAOstar_gov mentioned earlier, we still need further clarification on the KPI delivery, as it remains unclear. After reviewing your update, it does not appear to meet the originally promised targets.
So we would need more clarity on the proof of onboarding, as well as the reason why the educational posts were moved to the bootcamp phase, as raised in the questions below.
First, regarding onboarding — in your consolidated update, you mentioned achieving 60+ members. However, based on the two Luma event pages you shared, the combined registrations are around 67, which is still below the 150+ onboarding target.
That said, registration does not equal attendance, and attendance does not necessarily mean successful onboarding. Do you have a community channel (e.g., Telegram/Discord) where we can verify these onboarded members?
Second, we would like to understand the decision to move the 5 educational posts to the bootcamp phase. Based on the original plan, this was expected to be part of Milestone 1 delivery. Could you clarify the reasoning behind this change?
Lastly, we couldn’t access the technical presentation file, so we’re not able to review the materials used to train the 30 users. Could you share a working link so we can take a proper look?