Thank you for the detailed assessment and for recognizing the improvements in our updated submission. We appreciate the feedback and the opportunity to clarify key areas.
In terms of KPI delivery, we are aware that some of our initial goals, particularly the 150+ onboarding goal, were not entirely met. On hindsight, this was an overestimation for a first-phase activation within our local context. Our approach has instead prioritized organic growth and meaningful engagement, which we believe will result in stronger long-term retention and ecosystem participation.
We concur that registrations do not equate to successful onboarding when it comes to onboarding verification. Although there are approximately 67 registrations on the Luma pages, our primary goal has been to get join our activities and community .
On the educational posts, the shift to the bootcamp phase was intentional. Rather than early-stage, top-down content delivery, we chose to enable participants to create and share educational content themselves. This makes it possible for learning to be more experiential and practical, to increase engagement, and to spread across networks in a more genuine way. Even though this takes longer than the original timetable, we believe it will produce better results. We also believe that access to a more structured activity guide or presentation template from the Rootstock Collective would significantly improve our subsequent training sessions. Better alignment, consistency, and overall delivery quality would be made possible by this. Finally, we acknowledge the issue with the technical presentation link and will provide a working version for proper review.
Overall, Milestone 1 has provided useful insights that position us to deliver a more structured and measurable impact in the subsequent phase, despite the fact that some of its goals were not met. We are grateful for your ongoing support and remain committed to enhancing reporting and execution,as we take steps for our upcoming Bootcamping. —